Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • BeLikeWater
    Participant
    Post count: 20

    Dear Support

    I have contact with NinjaTrader and it seems that volume must be passed with an int. So that why the problem. Is there any solution inside TickStory for this?

    Thank you

    BeLikeWater

    BeLikeWater
    Participant
    Post count: 20

    Maybe the volume it was my fault Im testing again other exporting. But what I dont understand is the dates of the tick archives.

    Greetings

    Belikwater

    BeLikeWater
    Participant
    Post count: 20

    Dear Support

    Thank you very much.

    Greetings

    Belikewater

    BeLikeWater
    Participant
    Post count: 20

    Dear Support

    NinjaTrader doesnt seems to accept the volume format.

    Volumes of the file text attached are accepted until line 4.

    Do you something about this matter?

    Greetings

    Belikewater

    BeLikeWater
    Participant
    Post count: 20

    Dear Support

    Thank you for your answer, and yes I think its a great idea to put it predefined in the program.

    One more question regarding this issue, when I import into the Ninjatrader it ask me to put if the data is presented in Bid, Ask or Last. What should I put for the minute data?

    Thank you

    BeLikewater

    BeLikeWater
    Participant
    Post count: 20

    Dear Support

    Thank you it does work.

    Greetings

    BeLikewater

    BeLikeWater
    Participant
    Post count: 20

    @tickstory wrote:

    Hi BeLikeWater,

    Tickstory will always source its data from tick-accurate information, so if it’s about saving time on the download/export then this wont help since it always takes approximately the same time to produce a 1-minute data set as it does a tick-based dataset.

    If it’s about saving time when back-testing, what you could try is:

    1) Export the data as usual but then delete the FXT files.
    2) Start up MT4 but not via the Tickstory launcher.

    In theory, when you begin a back-test after this, MT4 will generate the FXT files based on the most granular data, being 1-minute. We haven’t tried this however and unfortunately it is too hard to support all the permutations of what is possible. Instead, we encourage users to discuss further about how may have a workaround. If there is a specific feature we can add to assist then we will have a look into it.

    Regards.

    Dear support

    Download time is not a problem.

    When you say: ” it always takes approximately the same time to produce a 1-minute data set as it does a tick-based dataset.” I suppose you have already download the tick data. The 1 minute data that you are refering contains every tick I suppose is not a “conventional” O-H-L-C data, right?

    Yeah definetly im trying to save time in my backtesting for EA that dont need tick data. I will try what you are telling me a comeback to present the results. Maybe with a bit of luck we will have the Fxt generated from the .hst data that are you refering to.
    Greetings

    BeLikeWater

    BeLikeWater
    Participant
    Post count: 20

    Do you mean that it only exports to MT4 with tick data right?

    When we create a file we can do it without tick data right? “Export to a file”

    Greetings

    BeLikewater

    BeLikeWater
    Participant
    Post count: 20

    @tickstory wrote:

    I believe Gooly was wanting to merely use the charts and not back-test and therefore does not need to export FXT files.

    Regards.

    Im pretty sure he wanted to backtest, but not with tick data. I have the same problem.

    Backtest with tick data is ok for the EA´s you need it.
    Also Backtesting without tickdata is the way to go for other EA´s.

    Greetings

    BeLikeWater

    BeLikeWater
    Participant
    Post count: 20

    Sorry, but if he doesnt create the fxt data for backtest and only the .hst data. How will mt4 create the FXT data needed for his backtesting purpouses?? Via converting the .hst imported data from Dukascopy into .fxt? How are we sure that we are backtesting Dukascopy data then?

    Thank you

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)