[fdaniloParticipant October 2, 2013 at 8:32 pm Post count: 6]

in reply to: Real and historical graphs are different.. spread? #19302

Hi, it’s Pepperstone
you can see in first image
I’ve tried many GMT.. wich do you recommend?
thanks

[fdaniloParticipant September 25, 2013 at 9:30 am Post count: 6]

in reply to: Real and historical graphs are different.. spread? #19300

hello
to the left you see the graphic downloaded from tickstory with mt4 offline and to the right the online graph

[attachment=1:wilnu9n9]Schermata 2013-09-25 alle 11.27.47.png[/attachment:wilnu9n9]

in this picture you see that the graphs of the two mt4 are identical, because we are in summertime

in the second image, we are on the same graph but in the month of March and how do you see gmt changes, and consequently can also change the candles and also the results of the backtest.

[attachment=0:wilnu9n9]Schermata 2013-09-25 alle 11.18.51.png[/attachment:wilnu9n9]

I’ve tried dozens of decisions and gmt different, but no one is always equal to the graph online

have I explained myself better?

thank you very much again

Danilo

[fdaniloParticipant September 22, 2013 at 12:54 pm Post count: 6]

in reply to: Real and historical graphs are different.. spread? #19298

hello, I try to explain better .. I’m using google translater.
I would like to do backtest on graphs as identical as possible to charts of my broker.
For example if I do backtest on historical metaquotes and then I used my EA on demo metaquotes, I know that the graphs correspond exactly to the historical (spreads, gmt, summertime, etc. ..).
So there is more chance that the optimization is valid.
Instead downloading the historian with Tickstory, also if I configure that correctly and I try more gmt, I can not find the historical identical to my broker.
Or the candles correspond only in summer and not in winter, or the 4 hours candles have different time..
There is always a difference of at least 4-5 pips for each spark plug.
With hundreds of different candles is logical that the indicators are very different, so the optimizations.
I guess I do not make mistakes, I am careful to keep the mt4 offline, I compare the historical graph offline with another mt4 online.
Another attempt that I will do tomorrow is to use the mt4 of “Fair Trade Technologies” that is connected to Dukascopy, I see so if historians downloaded from Tickstory (with Dukascopy database) are identical to charts FTT.

There’s something I wrong? Can you help me figure out if they are in the right direction or something wrong?

Thank you very much.

[fdaniloParticipant September 21, 2013 at 8:36 am Post count: 6]

in reply to: Real and historical graphs are different.. spread? #19296

No one can help me??

I can not get graphics equally between historical offline and real online
even if I follow all the tickstory setup instructions

please….

[fdaniloParticipant September 17, 2013 at 2:25 pm Post count: 6]

in reply to: Real and historical graphs are different.. spread? #19295

I’m noticing that the problem may be given by gmt

[attachment=0:3d2q1wth]Schermata 2013-09-17 alle 16.23.51.png[/attachment:3d2q1wth]

I’m trying all the gmt for different brokers, but there are many differences from the 4H chart on
I tried it with Pepperstone, FXDD, Alpari
all GMT +2, +3 for each broker, I also asked the assistance to be precise
but do not coincide GMT in historians with the downloaded graphics in real time
if they coincide are only for the summer, with daylight saving time change yet

can someone help me?
which broker do you use and which gmt?

thanks

[Author]

Posts