Different results with MT4 build 910 or 950

[netprofit]

Hi,
i just noticed, that i get totally different results with MT4 build 910 or 950.
I use Tickstory 1.7.2 with either 910 or 950, depending what the EA is made for.

I checked it today with 2 different EAs, that i got with both a totally loss with build 910 and a good profit with 950.
I just change the terminal.exe on the same MT4.

The problem now...: which is the correct result ?
here 910:
https://gyazo.com/b65a0b56890c6833336d7274272a2261

here 950:
https://gyazo.com/5cd1f18d433445f39d4030de2724c7ac

EA settings and all other is exactly the same.

What is the problem?
What can i do ?
And which one is correct?

Thanks

[tickstory]

Hi Netprofit,

Nice equity graph on Build 950 - hopefully we can resolve this in that favour. That said, there is a spread issue in Build 950 - have you made sure that you have applied the workaround that was described in the release notes here:

http://tickstory.com/articles/tickstory ... -released/

This is the only difference that we're aware of between Build 910 and 950. If you are still getting differences, you might need to print out a few of the critical variables in your EA if possible to make sure they match. I also don't understand how you are using v1.7.2 of Tickstory on Build 950. This version does not support Build 950 and will be giving you a launch error?

Thanks.

[netprofit]

Thanks,

unfortunately the graph from 910 was the correct one...
Ok, it was the issue with the spread settings.
I made the workaround and get exactly the same result with 910 or 950.

I have no problems to launch 950. There is a message from the launcher, but it works.
It only doesn't show the modelling quality "99,9%", it shows n/a . But exactly the same number of bars and ticks etc.

Thanks !

[tickstory]

Great to hear that you've found the problem (Not so great that it wasn't the ideal set of results!)